What You Need to Know About Garth Brooks’ Sexual Assault Accusations
The allegations against Garth Brooks are straightforward, but the details of the situation remain murky.
Brooks and the plaintiff, referred to as “Jane Roe,” provide conflicting accounts of events. He denies her claims of sexual assault, battery, and rape, even labeling the allegations as “extortion.” In response, Roe, through her attorney, asserts that Brooks is attempting to silence her and expresses confidence that he will be held accountable for his actions.
Overview of the Accusations
On October 3, Jane Roe filed a lawsuit in California state court accusing Garth Brooks of sexual assault and battery, detailing an alleged rape and ongoing harassment.
Who Is Jane Roe?
“Jane Roe” is a hairstylist and makeup artist who previously worked with Garth Brooks and Trisha Yearwood. She began working for Yearwood in 1999 and Brooks in 2017, ending her work with him in 2021 when she relocated to Mississippi. Brooks, however, claims that Roe served as an independent contractor for him for 15 years before her move.
Key Allegations Against Brooks
In a legal complaint obtained by Taste of Country, Roe outlines several serious allegations:
1. In early 2019, Roe claims Brooks emerged from the shower naked, grabbed her hands, and forced them onto his genitals while using sexual language.
2. In May 2019, she alleges she was raped by Brooks in a hotel room during a work trip for a Grammy tribute performance.
3. Later in October 2019, while preparing for another work trip, Brooks allegedly indicated he wanted to repeat the previous incident, but Roe managed to leave before anything occurred.
Roe’s filing also states that Brooks learned of her financial difficulties in early 2019, leading him to hire her more frequently. She alleges he would often discuss sexual topics, expose himself, and grope her while she worked. Additionally, Roe claims Brooks encouraged her to exchange sexual text messages and deleted many of their communications in 2020.
Supporting Evidence
Roe’s claims include references to text messages, phone records, trip receipts, and potential witnesses. While she provides one screenshot of an alleged exchange, the filing mentions several quotes attributed to both her and Brooks, as well as claims that others on Brooks’ team witnessed inappropriate behavior.
In response, Brooks’ preemptive lawsuit mirrors Roe’s claims without providing substantial supporting evidence, also citing a letter of demands sent in July.
Brooks’ Preemptive Lawsuit
On September 13, Brooks filed a motion to proceed under a pseudonym in federal court, aiming to prevent Roe from pursuing her lawsuit. He states that Roe’s legal team threatened to file sexual misconduct allegations unless he paid a significant sum. Brooks alleges that Roe even suggested she might hire someone to harm her.
His lawsuit emphasizes his intention to protect his reputation from “irreparable harm,” and he is represented by M. Patrick McDowell.
Brooks’ Response to Allegations
Shortly after the allegations became public, Brooks addressed the media, stating:
“For the last two months, I have been harassed with threats and lies. It has felt like a loaded gun is being held to my head. Hush money, regardless of the amount, still implies an admission of guilt for actions I would never commit. We filed suit against this person to counter extortion and defamation. We chose to file anonymously to protect our families.”
He concluded by expressing his desire to continue making music and his faith in the justice system, asserting, “I trust the system, I do not fear the truth, and I am not the man they are portraying me to be.”